Log4Pot vs Serverless Trap Honeyλ: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Log4Pot is a free honeypots & deception tool. Serverless Trap Honeyλ is a free honeypots & deception tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security teams running Java applications who need to confirm Log4Shell exploitation attempts in their environment should deploy Log4Pot; it's free and purpose-built specifically for this vulnerability, so you're not paying for detection breadth you don't need. The 91 GitHub stars and active maintenance signal it's being used in production by practitioners who've already solved the "which honeypot catches Log4j" question. Skip this if you're looking for a general-purpose honeypot framework that covers multiple vulnerability classes or integrates with your SOAR; Log4Pot's narrowness is its strength, not a limitation.
Security teams defending serverless architectures will find real value in Serverless Trap Honeyλ because it catches attackers and insiders at the moment they probe for real endpoints, not after breach. Free pricing and a 522-star GitHub community mean you can deploy honeytokens without budget friction and get battle-tested detection logic. Skip this if your threat model doesn't include reconnaissance-phase detection or if you're not running HTTP-based serverless workloads; honeypots require thoughtful placement to yield signal over noise.
