Lambda-Proxy vs Pacu: 2026 Comparison
Lambda-Proxy is a free penetration testing tool. Pacu is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers validating Lambda function security will find Lambda-Proxy invaluable for exposing SQL injection vulnerabilities that standard web application scanners miss, since it bridges SQLMap directly into AWS Lambda invoke calls through a local proxy. The tool is free and already battle-tested by security researchers, requiring no licensing overhead or vendor lock-in. Skip this if your team needs broad infrastructure scanning or compliance automation; Lambda-Proxy solves one problem exceptionally well and makes no apologies for the narrow scope.
Red teamers and cloud security engineers who need to validate AWS IAM misconfigurations will find Pacu's modular attack chains faster to customize than commercial frameworks, since you can fork the codebase directly. The 4,883 GitHub stars reflect active community contribution and real-world validation against common cloud privilege escalation paths. Skip this if your team lacks AWS-specific offensive knowledge or needs a guided UI; Pacu rewards practitioners who can read Python and chain attacks manually.
