EasySec ThinGUARD 2.0 vs Kudelski IoT keySTREAM: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

EasySec ThinGUARD 2.0

Mid-market and enterprise OT teams struggling with lateral movement inside industrial networks will find real value in ThinGUARD 2.0's device-level access control, which actually stops unauthorized movement between functional units rather than just logging it. The plug-and-play deployment means you're not rewriting control system logic or waiting months for integration, and the NIST PR.AA and DE.CM alignment proves it delivers on identity lockdown and continuous visibility simultaneously. Skip this if your priority is recovery and resilience over access prevention; ThinGUARD is built for containment, not post-breach orchestration.

Kudelski IoT keySTREAM

Mid-market and enterprise manufacturers with distributed IoT devices across supply chains need Kudelski IoT keySTREAM for its device identity provisioning and lifecycle management, which prevents unauthorized hardware from ever reaching production. The platform covers four of NIST CSF 2.0's critical supply chain and access control functions, particularly strong in GV.SC and PR.AA where most IoT deployments leak risk. Skip this if your IoT footprint is fewer than 500 devices or if you need horizontal cloud-native security; keySTREAM is built for managed, authenticated device ecosystems, not mixed IT/OT brownfield environments.