Who makes FourCore ATTACK vs Kiterunner?

**FourCore ATTACK** is developed by FourCore. **Kiterunner** is open-source with 3,119 GitHub stars. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Is FourCore ATTACK a good alternative to Kiterunner?

FourCore ATTACK and Kiterunner serve similar Offensive Security use cases: both are Offensive Security tools. Key differences: FourCore ATTACK is Commercial while Kiterunner is Free, Kiterunner is open-source. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.

FourCore ATTACK vs Kiterunner: 2026 Comparison Guide | CybersecTools

FourCore ATTACK vs Kiterunner: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Q: What is the difference between FourCore ATTACK vs Kiterunner?

**FourCore ATTACK**: FourCore ATTACK is an adversary emulation platform to manage cyber risk with evidence. built by FourCore.. **Kiterunner**: Kiterunner is a tool for lightning-fast traditional content discovery and bruteforcing API endpoints in modern applications.. Both serve the Offensive Security market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.

FourCore ATTACK is a commercial offensive security tool by FourCore. Kiterunner is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.

CST Verdict

Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:

FourCore ATTACK

Mid-market and enterprise teams that need to prove their defenses actually work against real adversary tactics will get the most from FourCore ATTACK. Its adversary emulation engine forces you to test detection and response workflows with evidence of what failed, moving beyond checkbox compliance toward ID.RA risk assessment that sticks with your board. Skip this if your team lacks the security maturity to act on emulation findings; the tool surfaces gaps faster than your people can typically close them.

Data verified May 2026