BLOKWORX SCUD + CDR vs Kaseya 365 Advanced Threat Protection: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

BLOKWORX SCUD + CDR

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace without dedicated email security should pick BLOKWORX SCUD + CDR for its API-first architecture that detects compromised accounts and BEC without touching MX records or requiring external visibility. The proxyless deployment means no gateway bottleneck, and the built-in SIEM and SOAR capabilities for email and account activity eliminate the separate tool tax most teams absorb. Skip this if you need advanced forensics on encrypted email content or run legacy on-premises mail servers; BLOKWORX is cloud-native by design.

Kaseya 365 Advanced Threat Protection

Mid-market and enterprise security teams defending SaaS and email environments will find real value in Kaseya 365 Advanced Threat Protection's AI-driven user behavior analytics, which catches account compromise and insider threats that signature-based tools routinely miss. The platform's strength in continuous monitoring and anomaly detection maps directly to NIST DE.CM and DE.AE, though its automated remediation is narrower than full incident response orchestration. Skip this if you're looking for a unified platform covering network detection, endpoints, and cloud workloads; Kaseya 365 ATP deliberately focuses on email and SaaS, which means tighter detection but less architectural flexibility.