Kamerka vs Phosphorus xIoT Security & Mgmt Platform: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Kamerka

Industrial security teams without existing OT asset visibility should start with Kamerka before buying expensive discovery platforms. It's free, runs on Shodan's public internet scan data, and surfaces exposed industrial devices in minutes; 788 GitHub stars reflect active use by practitioners who actually hunt ICS/IoT risks. The major caveat: Kamerka only sees what's internet-facing, so networks properly segmented from external access won't benefit, and you'll still need manual validation and network-specific tools to understand what lives on your actual operational floors.

Phosphorus xIoT Security & Mgmt Platform

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing sprawling IoT and OT device estates will get the most from Phosphorus xIoT Security & Mgmt Platform because it actually remediates instead of just reporting; automated password rotation, firmware updates at scale, and certificate lifecycle management mean your team fixes vulnerabilities instead of creating ticket backlogs. The platform maps directly to NIST CSF 2.0 Asset Management and Platform Security, which matters when you're auditing thousands of devices that nobody fully documented until now. Skip this if you need deep forensics or threat hunting on OT devices; Phosphorus prioritizes ongoing hygiene and state management over incident investigation.