jwt-cracker vs jwtear: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
jwt-cracker is a free penetration testing tool. jwtear is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers and security researchers validating JWT implementations in development and staging environments should reach for jwt-cracker first; its simplicity means you're testing the actual weakness, not fighting the tool. With 1,131 GitHub stars and zero dependencies, it's lightweight enough to run inline in CI/CD pipelines or during code review phases. Skip this if you're hunting vulnerabilities in production tokens under time pressure or need to crack keys stronger than basic brute force can handle; for that work, you'll need something with GPU acceleration and dictionary optimization.
Penetration testers and AppSec engineers who need to quickly decode, validate, and forge JWT tokens during assessments will find jwtear indispensable; it's a command-line native that handles the manipulation workflows that web UI tools slow down. The 106 GitHub stars reflect active maintenance and real adoption by practitioners who live in terminals, not dashboards. Skip this if your team needs a GUI or a tool that also handles OAuth flows and other token types; jwtear is deliberately JWT-focused and lightweight.
