Cerebra mPass sso vs Iru Identity: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Cerebra mPass sso

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing fragmented application access across on-premises infrastructure should evaluate Cerebra mPass sso for its passwordless authentication and real-time SIEM monitoring, which address both the access control and continuous monitoring sides of identity governance. The platform's support for air-gapped deployments and native Active Directory/LDAP integration means you're not betting on cloud connectivity or third-party identity providers. Skip this if you need cloud-first SSO, rapid SaaS onboarding, or vendor support from a larger player; Cerebra's on-premises focus and Middle East headquarters make it a harder sell in environments requiring geographic redundancy or established vendor relationships.

Iru Identity

Mid-market and enterprise teams tired of password sprawl will find real value in Iru Identity's passkey-based authentication and device posture enforcement, which actually reduces the attack surface that traditional MFA leaves open. The platform's GitOps-style configuration management and SCIM provisioning mean your IAM policies stay version-controlled and your user lifecycle scales without manual overhead. Skip this if you need deep legacy protocol support or are locked into a vendor ecosystem; Iru's strength in passwordless and conditional access comes at the cost of breadth in older authentication methods.