Iru AI vs Zip Identity and Access Management: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Iru AI

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing Apple, Windows, and Android devices will gain most from Iru AI's passwordless authentication tied to device identity, which eliminates the credential-stuffing surface area that plagues traditional MFA deployments. The platform covers NIST PR.AA and DE.CM strongly through device-bound authentication and continuous endpoint monitoring, plus its compliance automation with evidence collection reduces audit labor substantially. Skip this if you need mature incident response and forensics capabilities; Iru's strength is prevention and continuous compliance, not RS.AN depth.

Zip Identity and Access Management

Mid-market and enterprise teams rolling out MFA at scale will get the most from Zip Identity and Access Management; it's built specifically to surface adoption blockers and enforce completion across subsidiaries without forcing a full Okta or Azure AD rip-and-replace. The platform covers both authentication enforcement and session anomaly detection, mapping directly to NIST PR.AA and DE.CM, which means you're monitoring both access control and the behavior that follows it. Skip this if you need deep provisioning workflows or entitlement management; Zip prioritizes MFA visibility and unexpected login detection over access request automation.