GreatHorn Mailbox Intelligence vs IRONSCALES Protect: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

GreatHorn Mailbox Intelligence

Teams running Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace who need users to actually catch phishing will find GreatHorn Mailbox Intelligence worthwhile, because the visual sender indicators and on-click URL analysis force friction into the attack chain where it matters most. The tool scores across all three NIST Detect and Awareness categories, with particular strength in DE.CM continuous monitoring and real-time risk assessment that surfaces threats before the user opens them. Skip this if your organization has already deployed a mature endpoint detection layer and expects email security to handle lateral movement detection; GreatHorn prioritizes the user reporting loop and initial threat identification, not forensic analysis of compromise.

IRONSCALES Protect

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in phishing false positives will find real value in IRONSCALES Protect's human-in-the-loop model, which routes suspicious emails to analysts instead of auto-quarantining everything. The platform's continuous monitoring and detection of attacks bypassing existing controls address the hard truth that signature-based email gateways alone are failing; IRONSCALES' AI learns from human decisions to improve future classifications. Skip this if your organization needs a fire-and-forget tool with minimal analyst involvement or if you lack dedicated security staff to feed the feedback loop.