FlintX OT Security Platform vs iOT365 Cybersecurity Platform: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

FlintX OT Security Platform

Mid-market and enterprise teams securing industrial control systems need FlintX OT Security Platform for its AI-native threat hunting that actually maps to ICS attack patterns rather than forcing generic IT detection rules onto OT networks. The platform covers the full incident lifecycle from asset discovery through automated containment, with explicit MITRE ICS ATT&CK correlation and compliance tracking for IEC 62443 and NERC CIP. Skip this if your organization treats OT as a bolt-on to enterprise security operations; FlintX demands dedicated OT expertise to configure and tune properly.

iOT365 Cybersecurity Platform

Mid-market and enterprise teams protecting critical infrastructure will find iOT365 Cybersecurity Platform strongest in the detection and forensics phases, particularly its AI-powered false positive reduction on OT/IoT traffic and agentless network discovery across proprietary protocols. The platform covers NIST ID.AM through RS.AN thoroughly, with compliance alignment to NIST, NIS2, IEC 62443, and NERC CIP built in from the start. The honest gap: incident response playbook generation is there, but this platform prioritizes seeing what's happening and proving what happened over orchestrated remediation workflows, so teams needing tight integration with ticketing systems or automated containment should evaluate competing SOC-centric tools first.