Inceptor vs WebDAV Covert Channel: 2026 Comparison
Inceptor is a free offensive security tool. WebDAV Covert Channel is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Red teams and security engineers who need to validate EDR evasion gaps without building detection payloads from scratch will get immediate value from Inceptor's template-driven approach; you're essentially getting a structured framework for testing what your detection stack actually misses rather than guessing. The 1,785 GitHub stars and free model mean you can run controlled evasion tests across your environment without procurement friction. Skip this if your organization wants a turnkey red team platform with full command and control infrastructure; Inceptor is deliberately focused on the narrow problem of technique generation and detection validation, not end-to-end adversary simulation.
Red team operators and penetration testers validating WebDAV weaknesses in their own infrastructure will find WebDAV Covert Channel valuable for demonstrating C2 evasion tactics that slip past signature-based detection. The tool's use of native WebDAV protocol features means it generates legitimate-looking traffic patterns that most organizations haven't specifically instrumented to catch, making it effective for stress-testing detection gaps in NIST Detect capabilities. Skip this if your goal is operational C2 for live engagements; it's a lab tool for controlled assessment, not a field weapon, and requires explicit network access to WebDAV services most enterprises have already disabled.
