IBM QRadar EDR vs Trend Micro Apex One: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
IBM QRadar EDR is a commercial endpoint detection and response tool by IBM. Trend Micro Apex One is a free endpoint detection and response tool by Trend Micro. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best endpoint detection and response fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in endpoint alerts will see immediate value in IBM QRadar EDR's AI-powered false-positive reduction, which cuts noise enough to let analysts actually investigate real threats. The NanoOS deep visibility layer and DeStra custom detection rules let you tune detection precisely to your environment rather than accepting vendor defaults. Skip this if your team lacks the SOC maturity to operationalize guided remediation workflows; QRadar EDR assumes you have analysts who can act on automated insights, not replace them entirely.
Mid-market to enterprise security teams managing hybrid infrastructure will get the most from Trend Micro Apex One because its agent-based architecture catches fileless attacks and living-off-the-land techniques that network tools miss. The platform earned a 4.7/5 on G2 for detection accuracy, and its XGen engine consolidates threat intelligence across on-premises, cloud, and edge endpoints into a single console. Skip this if you need lightweight EDR for 50-person offices or if your stack is already locked into Microsoft; Apex One's strength lies in heterogeneous environments where you're running multiple OS types and don't want ten separate point solutions.
