hollows_hunter vs readpe: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
hollows_hunter is a free digital forensics and incident response tool. readpe is a free digital forensics and incident response tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best digital forensics and incident response fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Incident responders and threat hunters investigating suspected process memory compromise need hollows_hunter for one reason: it catches in-memory implants and hooks that EDR telemetry often misses, giving you direct forensic proof of what actually ran. The 2,318 GitHub stars reflect real adoption among practitioners doing manual malware analysis, not marketing reach. Skip this if your team lacks Windows reverse-engineering skills or expects automated remediation; hollows_hunter is a scalpel for hands-on investigators, not a fire-and-forget detection engine.
Incident responders and malware analysts who need to quickly reverse-engineer Windows binaries will find readpe invaluable; it extracts PE headers, sections, imports, and entropy metrics from the command line faster than GUI tools and without leaving forensic artifacts. The tool is free and open-source with active maintenance, making it a standard addition to incident response playbooks alongside strings and objdump. Skip this if your team relies on GUI-based static analysis platforms or needs automated malware classification; readpe requires familiarity with PE file internals and Windows architecture to be useful.
