Dispel Wicket Industrial Gateway vs HiveMQ HiveMQ Platform: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Dispel Wicket Industrial Gateway

Mid-market and enterprise OT teams managing distributed assets across air-gapped or NATed networks should evaluate Wicket Industrial Gateway for its zero trust remote access that doesn't require internet connectivity at each site; offline mode and Wicket chaining directly address the segmentation patterns of Purdue model deployments. The 65,000+ protocol support and NIST PR.AA coverage for access control reflect a platform built for OT's protocol diversity, not retrofitted from IT tooling. This isn't for buyers primarily concerned with detecting anomalies in operational traffic; Wicket prioritizes secure connectivity and data streaming over continuous monitoring, leaving that burden on downstream analytics layers.

HiveMQ HiveMQ Platform

Enterprise and mid-market operations teams managing distributed industrial assets will find HiveMQ HiveMQ Platform essential if real-time MQTT data streaming from edge to cloud is your bottleneck; the Unified Namespace architecture handles the contextualization and governance that most point solutions skip, and native support for mission-critical high availability means you're not bolting on redundancy afterward. The platform's strength in NIST ID.AM and PR.IR reflects solid asset tracking and resilience design, though continuous monitoring capabilities lag competitors focused on threat detection. Skip this if your priority is security-first visibility into OT anomalies rather than operational data plumbing; HiveMQ solves the data pipeline problem, not the ICS threat hunting problem.