Heralding vs Telnet IoT Honeypot: 2026 Comparison
Heralding is a free honeypots & deception tool. Telnet IoT Honeypot is a free honeypots & deception tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security teams running small to mid-sized networks who want credential intelligence without deployment complexity should start with Heralding. It collects plaintext credentials across SSH, HTTP, SMTP, and a dozen other protocols through a lightweight honeypot, giving you immediate visibility into what attackers are actually trying; the 388 GitHub stars and zero licensing friction mean you can spin it up in minutes to see if credential harvesting is happening in your environment. Skip this if you need SIEM integration, alerting automation, or honeypot management at scale; Heralding is deliberately minimal, which is why it works.
Security teams hunting IoT botnets and malware variants will get the most from Telnet IoT Honeypot because it captures actual binaries through live telnet emulation rather than static signatures alone. The 313 GitHub stars and active community contributions signal real-world adoption among researchers and threat intel groups who need to isolate and reverse-engineer IoT malware families. Skip this if you need production-grade threat intelligence feeds or automated incident response; Telnet IoT Honeypot is a collection and analysis tool for specialists, not a turnkey detection layer.
