Heralding vs Mailoney: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Heralding is a free honeypots & deception tool. Mailoney is a free honeypots & deception tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security teams running small to mid-sized networks who want credential intelligence without deployment complexity should start with Heralding. It collects plaintext credentials across SSH, HTTP, SMTP, and a dozen other protocols through a lightweight honeypot, giving you immediate visibility into what attackers are actually trying; the 388 GitHub stars and zero licensing friction mean you can spin it up in minutes to see if credential harvesting is happening in your environment. Skip this if you need SIEM integration, alerting automation, or honeypot management at scale; Heralding is deliberately minimal, which is why it works.
Security teams building internal threat intelligence programs will get real value from Mailoney's modular SMTP honeypot design, which lets you customize deception tactics for your specific attack surface rather than running generic traps. The 280 GitHub stars and active module ecosystem mean you're working with battle-tested code that others in your position have already hardened. Skip this if you need a turnkey, managed honeypot service or expect vendor-backed incident response; Mailoney demands you own the deployment, tuning, and log analysis yourself.
