Heralding vs HonTel: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Heralding is a free honeypots & deception tool. HonTel is a free honeypots & deception tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security teams running small to mid-sized networks who want credential intelligence without deployment complexity should start with Heralding. It collects plaintext credentials across SSH, HTTP, SMTP, and a dozen other protocols through a lightweight honeypot, giving you immediate visibility into what attackers are actually trying; the 388 GitHub stars and zero licensing friction mean you can spin it up in minutes to see if credential harvesting is happening in your environment. Skip this if you need SIEM integration, alerting automation, or honeypot management at scale; Heralding is deliberately minimal, which is why it works.
Security teams running legacy infrastructure with exposed Telnet ports should deploy HonTel to catch reconnaissance activity that IP reputation lists miss; it's free and requires minimal setup, making it practical for resource-constrained ops teams managing aging systems. With 162 GitHub stars and active maintenance, the tool delivers reliable signal for a narrowly focused attack surface. Skip this if your environment has already eliminated Telnet entirely or if you need honeypots covering SSH, HTTP, or databases; HonTel does one thing well and stops there.
