Hadoop PCAP library vs PacketQ: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros and cons, compared head to head.
Hadoop PCAP library is a free digital forensics tool. PacketQ is a free digital forensics tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best digital forensics fit for your security stack. Independent and vendor-neutral: we never sell rankings.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Incident response teams with petabyte-scale PCAP archives will find Hadoop PCAP library invaluable for distributed packet analysis that would timeout on single-node tools; the 213 GitHub stars reflect active use in large forensic investigations where query speed directly impacts mean time to investigate. Skip this if your team processes gigabytes or less monthly, or if you need a GUI instead of command-line Hadoop integration; you'll waste engineering cycles for zero gain.
Incident response teams who need to hunt through packet captures without waiting for GUI tools or commercial PCAP analyzers should reach for PacketQ. The SQL-query approach lets analysts filter and correlate network artifacts in seconds what would take minutes in traditional packet inspection tools, and it's genuinely free with no licensing friction. Skip this if your team lacks command-line fluency or needs graphical packet visualization; PacketQ solves the analyst's problem, not the manager's dashboard problem.
