Exploit-Challenges vs HackTheArch: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Exploit-Challenges is a free cyber range training tool. HackTheArch is a free cyber range training tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best cyber range training fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security engineers and vulnerability researchers who need hands-on practice with real exploitation techniques should use Exploit-Challenges; it's the rare free resource that forces you to actually reverse-engineer and exploit ARM binaries rather than following scripted labs. With 938 GitHub stars and zero paywall, you get legitimate practice across multiple architectures without the corporate overhead of commercial cyber ranges. Skip this if your team needs managed infrastructure, progress tracking, or compliance-aligned reporting; Exploit-Challenges is purely a practice ground for developers who already know what they're hunting for.
Security teams building internal cyber range programs for hands-on training will find HackTheArch valuable because its open-source Rails architecture keeps setup friction low and lets you customize scoring logic without vendor lock-in. The 72 GitHub stars and active Ruby community mean you're not betting on a solo maintainer, and the web-based hint system handles the tedious logistics of running live CTF events. Skip this if your organization needs a managed SaaS platform with built-in content libraries and instructor dashboards; HackTheArch requires you to author your own challenges and manage the infrastructure yourself.
