Hack The Box Hacking Labs vs Krypton: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Hack The Box Hacking Labs is a commercial cyber range training tool by Hack The Box. Krypton is a free cyber range training tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best cyber range training fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Security teams building a defensible workforce need Hack The Box Hacking Labs to make hands-on training stick at scale; 1,720 labs across difficulty levels mean junior analysts and architects both find relevant practice without the friction of lab sprawl. The platform covers both NIST ID.RA and PR.AT functions, with Sherlocks forensics modules and Guided Mode walkthroughs reducing the setup tax that kills most training programs before they gain momentum. Skip this if your org needs simulation of your actual infrastructure or red-team coordination; Hack The Box is a skills foundry, not an incident response sandbox.
Security teams building a red team program or running internal capture-the-flag competitions should use Krypton to baseline and measure technical hacking skills across your staff. The wargame format forces hands-on exploitation rather than multiple-choice knowledge checks, so you'll see which engineers can actually chain vulnerabilities under time pressure. Skip this if you need a compliance-driven training platform; Krypton is a skill validator, not a checkbox trainer.
