Habu Hacking Toolkit vs mitmproxy: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Habu Hacking Toolkit is a free penetration testing tool. mitmproxy is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security teams building internal red team capacity on a budget should reach for Habu Hacking Toolkit; it gives you Python-native attack primitives that integrate cleanly into custom exploitation workflows without licensing friction. The 973 GitHub stars and active maintenance signal a tool mature enough for repeatable penetration testing scenarios. Skip this if your team needs a GUI-driven platform or commercial support; Habu demands Python fluency and rewards operators who read code, not buttons.
Security researchers and penetration testers embedded in application security workflows should use mitmproxy for intercepting and inspecting encrypted web traffic at scale; its free, open-source model and 42,681 GitHub stars reflect sustained adoption among practitioners who need visibility into HTTP/2 and WebSocket traffic without vendor licensing constraints. The console interface makes request/response manipulation faster than GUI-only proxies once you accept the learning curve. Skip this if your team needs centralized policy enforcement or audit logging for compliance; mitmproxy is a hacker's workbench, not a gateway appliance.
