GuardRisk vs Ingalls CSAR®: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

GuardRisk: AI assistant for auditors to analyze docs & answer GRC compliance questions. built by GuardRisk. Core capabilities include AI compliance chat for regulatory Q&A across supported frameworks, AI-powered document and evidence analysis against selected frameworks, Support for 18 compliance frameworks including ISO 27001:2022, GDPR, NIST CSF, MAS TRM, and more..

Ingalls CSAR®: Automation tool helping DoD contractors prepare for RMF-based ATO approval. built by Ingalls Information Security. Core capabilities include Automated mapping of mandatory ATO forms (ITCSC, PIA, PCIL) from single-entry responses, Modular guided question flow with question-level feedback on timeline and package return risk, Centralized dashboard for tracking application status, package progress, and submission timelines..

Both serve the Compliance Management market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

GuardRisk differentiates with AI compliance chat for regulatory Q&A across supported frameworks, AI-powered document and evidence analysis against selected frameworks, Support for 18 compliance frameworks including ISO 27001:2022, GDPR, NIST CSF, MAS TRM, and more. Ingalls CSAR® differentiates with Automated mapping of mandatory ATO forms (ITCSC, PIA, PCIL) from single-entry responses, Modular guided question flow with question-level feedback on timeline and package return risk, Centralized dashboard for tracking application status, package progress, and submission timelines.

GuardRisk is developed by GuardRisk. Ingalls CSAR® is developed by Ingalls Information Security. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

GuardRisk and Ingalls CSAR® serve similar Compliance Management use cases: both are Compliance Management tools, both cover NIST, Security Framework. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.