Greenbone OPENVAS BASIC vs Rapid7 InsightVM: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Small and mid-market security teams with limited budgets will find real value in Greenbone OPENVAS BASIC because it covers the major vendor stacks (Oracle, Microsoft, Cisco, VMware, Palo Alto) without forcing you into expensive multi-year contracts. The on-premises deployment model means no recurring SaaS fees, and LDAP/Radius integration handles authentication without extra tooling. Skip this if you need continuous monitoring with automated response; OPENVAS BASIC prioritizes the scan-and-report workflow over real-time anomaly detection, leaving the response half of your risk cycle understaffed. Mid-market and enterprise teams drowning in vulnerability backlogs will see immediate ROI from InsightVM's Active Risk scoring, which actually deprioritizes low-context vulnerabilities instead of treating every CVE as equally urgent. The AI-driven CVSS adjustments and remediation workflow automation with SLA tracking cut triage time meaningfully, and Rapid7's threat intelligence integration flags emergent threats faster than you'd catch them manually. Skip this if your primary need is compliance checkbox scanning; InsightVM prioritizes risk reduction over policy attestation, which means weaker coverage for ID.RA asset discovery compared to tools that lean harder into continuous monitoring and configuration assessment.

Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion: