Loading...
Greenbone OPENVAS BASIC is a commercial vulnerability assessment tool by Greenbone AG. Fortra VM is a commercial vulnerability assessment tool by Fortra. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best vulnerability assessment fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Small and mid-market security teams with limited budgets will find real value in Greenbone OPENVAS BASIC because it covers the major vendor stacks (Oracle, Microsoft, Cisco, VMware, Palo Alto) without forcing you into expensive multi-year contracts. The on-premises deployment model means no recurring SaaS fees, and LDAP/Radius integration handles authentication without extra tooling. Skip this if you need continuous monitoring with automated response; OPENVAS BASIC prioritizes the scan-and-report workflow over real-time anomaly detection, leaving the response half of your risk cycle understaffed.
Entry-level vulnerability management solution for small and medium businesses
Risk-based vulnerability management platform for scanning and prioritization
Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.
Access via MCPNo reviews yet
No reviews yet
Explore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.
Common questions about comparing Greenbone OPENVAS BASIC vs Fortra VM for your vulnerability assessment needs.
Greenbone OPENVAS BASIC: Entry-level vulnerability management solution for small and medium businesses. built by Greenbone AG. headquartered in Germany. Core capabilities include Vulnerability scanning for consumer and enterprise software, Automated scan initialization, Vulnerability reporting..
Fortra VM: Risk-based vulnerability management platform for scanning and prioritization. built by Fortra. headquartered in United States. Core capabilities include Vulnerability scanning and identification, Risk-based vulnerability prioritization, Threat ranking based on real-world exploitation vectors..
Both serve the Vulnerability Assessment market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.
Get strategic cybersecurity insights in your inbox
