go-audit vs Sigma Query: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
go-audit is a free security information and event management tool. Sigma Query is a free security information and event management tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best security information and event management fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Linux infrastructure teams managing high-volume audit logs will get the most from go-audit because it replaces auditd's brittle single-threaded daemon with a netlink-based architecture that doesn't drop events under load. The JSON output and pluggable pipeline design mean you can stream directly to your SIEM without parsing or custom connectors, saving weeks of integration work. Skip this if you need Windows or macOS audit collection or expect vendor support; go-audit is community-maintained and requires teams comfortable reading Go source code when things break.
Startups and mid-market SOCs building detection programs from scratch should use Sigma Query to avoid reinventing rules; 3,000+ community-maintained detections mapped to 385+ MITRE ATT&CK techniques means you start with mature baselines instead of blank templates. The free model and cloud deployment eliminate procurement friction, and multi-platform coverage across Windows, Linux, cloud providers, and network appliances lets you apply the same rule set across your entire stack without rewriting. Skip this if your team lacks SIEM experience or needs rules packaged inside a commercial product with vendor support; Sigma Query requires you to understand your detection logic well enough to integrate and tune community rules yourself.
