Glastopf vs TANNER: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Glastopf is a free honeypots & deception tool. TANNER is a free honeypots & deception tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security teams building internal deception networks to catch reconnaissance traffic will get the most from Glastopf, because its modular vulnerability emulation lets you customize which weaknesses to advertise without running actual vulnerable code. The 597 GitHub stars and active Python codebase reflect a tool that works reliably for low-touch deployment in lab and staging environments. Skip Glastopf if you need enterprise-scale honeypot management, alerting integration, or support for non-web protocols; it's built for teams who can maintain infrastructure themselves and tolerate slower response cycles.
Security teams deploying SNARE honeypots will find TANNER's value in its ability to automate realistic HTTP response generation and vulnerability emulation without maintaining separate backend infrastructure. The free pricing model and active GitHub presence (231 stars) make it practical for resource-constrained security operations looking to increase honeypot fidelity without headcount. TANNER is built for detection and intelligence gathering; it won't help teams that need honeypots integrated into a broader incident response or threat hunting platform.
