Glastopf vs Shockpot-Frontend: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Glastopf is a free honeypots & deception tool. Shockpot-Frontend is a free honeypots & deception tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security teams building internal deception networks to catch reconnaissance traffic will get the most from Glastopf, because its modular vulnerability emulation lets you customize which weaknesses to advertise without running actual vulnerable code. The 597 GitHub stars and active Python codebase reflect a tool that works reliably for low-touch deployment in lab and staging environments. Skip Glastopf if you need enterprise-scale honeypot management, alerting integration, or support for non-web protocols; it's built for teams who can maintain infrastructure themselves and tolerate slower response cycles.
Security teams running Shockpot honeypots who need to surface attack patterns across their deployment will find value in Shockpot-Frontend's ability to visualize and chart honeypot events without building custom dashboards. The tool is free and connects directly to PostgreSQL, removing vendor lock-in and licensing friction for organizations already invested in the Shockpot honeypot project. Skip this if you're looking for alert orchestration, response workflows, or integration with your SIEM; Shockpot-Frontend is visualization only, and the four GitHub stars suggest limited adoption and maintenance activity.
