git-dumper vs MagSpoof: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros and cons, compared head to head.
git-dumper is a free penetration testing tool. MagSpoof is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack. Independent and vendor-neutral: we never sell rankings.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers and bug bounty hunters should use git-dumper when they've found a misconfigured .git directory exposed on a target website; it automates the tedious work of reconstructing the full repository from fragments, saving hours versus manual extraction. The 2,266 GitHub stars reflect actual adoption in offensive security workflows where this specific attack vector appears regularly. Skip this if you're looking for a general source code discovery tool or need to handle repositories protected by authentication; git-dumper is a single-purpose exploit for a known misconfiguration, not a reconnaissance platform.
Penetration testers and hardware security researchers validating payment terminal defenses need MagSpoof because it's one of the few free tools that actually demonstrates magnetic stripe cloning attacks without requiring expensive lab equipment or proprietary hardware. The 4,098 GitHub stars and active security research community mean you're working with a tool battle-tested by real red teamers, not theoretical code. Skip this if your scope is modern contactless or EMV chip validation; MagSpoof's strength is proving legacy magnetic stripe vulnerabilities that most organizations have already mitigated.
