GHH - Google Hack Honeypot vs Thinkst Applied Research: 2026 Comparison
GHH - Google Hack Honeypot is a free honeypots & deception tool. Thinkst Applied Research is a commercial honeypots & deception tool by Thinkst Applied Research. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Security teams defending applications indexed by Google search will find GHH's approach valuable because it catches attackers using Google dorking and similar search-based reconnaissance before they probe your actual systems. The tool operates at zero cost and requires minimal infrastructure, making it practical for teams with thin budgets who can't justify commercial honeypot platforms. Skip this if your threat model centers on internal network lateral movement or supply chain attacks; GHH is narrow by design, focused on external search engine abuse as an attack vector.
Startups and mid-market teams running lean security programs should use Thinkst Canary to catch attackers actually moving through their network rather than waiting for alerts from tools they can't afford to tune properly. You deploy a honeypot in under three minutes and get notified the moment it's touched; Canarytokens extends that same logic to documents and emails at zero cost, covering both NIST Detect and Identify functions without requiring infrastructure investment. Skip this if you need deep forensics on how a breach happened after the fact or expect vendor hand-holding during incident response; Thinkst excels at triggering the alarm, not unraveling the full kill chain.
