genua Remote Maintenance vs Rhebo OT Security: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

genua Remote Maintenance

Mid-market and enterprise OT teams managing distributed maintenance access across critical industrial networks should pick genua Remote Maintenance because it enforces Zero Trust at the remote session layer, not just at the perimeter. The vendor's Security by Design architecture and explicit support for privileged access management mean you're not bolting trust controls onto a legacy remote tool. This is not for organizations seeking a single pane of glass across IT and OT security; genua focuses narrowly on the remote maintenance use case and assumes you already have asset monitoring and detection tooling in place.

Rhebo OT Security

Mid-market and enterprise manufacturers with fragmented OT networks need Rhebo OT Security for anomaly detection that actually works across legacy and modern ICS environments without requiring full network redesign. The platform discovers and monitors assets in-place while flagging both cyberattacks and operational faults through MITRE ATT&CK for ICS patterns, which matters because most OT teams can't distinguish between a breach and a misconfiguration until it's too late. Skip this if your priority is IT/OT convergence or you need tight integration with your SOC's existing EDR stack; Rhebo prioritizes OT detection and isolation over incident response orchestration.