Genie Networks GenieATM vs Imperva DDoS Protection: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Genie Networks GenieATM

ISPs and internet data center operators protecting against volumetric DDoS should choose GenieATM for its multi-layer traffic correlation,Flow records, SNMP, and BGP data analyzed together catch carpet bombing and zero-day anomalies that single-method detection misses. The distributed collector architecture scales across provider networks without choking backbone monitoring, and automated BGP FlowSpec mitigation executes faster than manual scrubbing. Skip this if you're an enterprise behind a single ISP pipe; GenieATM assumes you control routing policy and want forensic raw data preservation for attack analysis, not just traffic blocking.

Imperva DDoS Protection

Teams protecting APIs and web applications under sustained volumetric attack need Imperva DDoS Protection for its 3-second mitigation SLA on Layer 3 and 4 floods, which eliminates the window where traffic actually reaches your infrastructure. The 13 Tbps global scrubbing capacity and Anycast routing handle the size of attacks most vendors only claim to handle. Skip this if your DDoS concern is primarily application-layer sophistication; Imperva's Layer 7 protection exists but the real competitive edge is raw speed on the attacks that actually cause downtime.