Forward Enterprise for Multi-cloud vs Google Cloud Security: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Forward Enterprise for Multi-cloud

Enterprise security teams managing routing and network policy across AWS, on-premises, and secondary cloud providers need Forward Enterprise for Multi-cloud to catch misconfigurations that span infrastructure layers most CSPM tools ignore. Its network digital twin models hop-by-hop paths across hybrid environments and validates intent through automated policy checks, directly covering NIST ID.AM and PR.IR control families that point-in-time cloud inventory tools leave incomplete. Skip this if your architecture is single-cloud or if you need application-layer visibility; Forward's strength is infrastructure-layer topology and routing mistake detection, not workload compliance or data exposure scanning.

Google Cloud Security

Organizations already committed to Google Cloud Platform will find Google Cloud Security valuable for enforcing zero-trust access and compliance controls across workloads without rip-and-replace; the integrated BeyondCorp Enterprise, VPC Service Controls, and Assured Workloads stack means access decisions and data perimeters are built into your cloud architecture rather than bolted on afterward. The platform covers nine NIST CSF 2.0 functions including strong Identity Management and Continuous Monitoring capabilities, with Security Command Center providing native visibility into threats across GCP services. Skip this if you're multi-cloud and need vendor-agnostic CSPM, or if you're still evaluating whether to commit to GCP; the tooling assumes you've already made that decision.