Fluency Security AI Workflow vs Tines AI-driven SOC: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Fluency Security AI Workflow: AI-driven workflow for triaging endpoint files with unknown reputation. built by Fluency Security. Core capabilities include AI-driven investigative workflow for unknown file reputation events, Soft logic verdict analysis with reasoned output, Automated IOC extraction from sandbox results..

Tines AI-driven SOC: AI-driven workflow automation platform for SOC operations and security tasks. built by Tines. Core capabilities include Visual workflow builder (Storyboard) for creating automation workflows, Case management system with SLA tracking and metrics, AI copilot (Workbench) for natural language workflow interaction..

Both serve the Security Orchestration Automation and Response market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Fluency Security AI Workflow differentiates with AI-driven investigative workflow for unknown file reputation events, Soft logic verdict analysis with reasoned output, Automated IOC extraction from sandbox results. Tines AI-driven SOC differentiates with Visual workflow builder (Storyboard) for creating automation workflows, Case management system with SLA tracking and metrics, AI copilot (Workbench) for natural language workflow interaction.

Fluency Security AI Workflow is developed by Fluency Security. Tines AI-driven SOC is developed by Tines. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Fluency Security AI Workflow and Tines AI-driven SOC serve similar Security Orchestration Automation and Response use cases: both are Security Orchestration Automation and Response tools. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.