FireEye Detection On Demand vs peepdf: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
FireEye Detection On Demand is a commercial malware analysis tool by FireEye. peepdf is a free malware analysis tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best malware analysis fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Security teams needing fast, authoritative malware verdicts on suspicious files and URLs should run them through FireEye Detection On Demand before deciding whether to block or investigate further. The cloud API processes submissions through FireEye's actual execution engine rather than signature matching alone, giving you analysis depth typically reserved for expensive incident response retainers. Skip this if your team lacks API integration bandwidth or needs behavioral analysis of binaries already running on endpoints; Detection On Demand is triage and verification, not continuous monitoring.
Incident responders and forensic analysts who need to extract and analyze malicious PDF content without touching a GUI will find peepdf indispensable; it deconstructs PDFs at the object level, exposing embedded scripts, streams, and obfuscation that GUI tools miss. The 1,437 GitHub stars and active Python community mean you get real-world detection patterns plus the ability to script analysis across thousands of samples. Skip this if your team lacks Python fluency or needs a point-and-click interface; peepdf rewards command-line operators and penalizes those hunting for hand-holding.
