exploit_me vs SudoCyber: 2026 Comparison
exploit_me is a free cyber range training tool. SudoCyber is a commercial cyber range training tool by SudoCyber. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best cyber range training fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Security training leads and red teamers running internal skill assessments will get immediate value from exploit_me because the 14 progressive vulnerability levels let you scaffold difficulty without building custom labs from scratch. The ARM/ARM64 architecture and 960 GitHub stars signal active community validation for realistic exploitation scenarios. Skip this if your team needs a commercial platform with instructor dashboards, scoring automation, or compliance reporting; exploit_me is deliberately a bare-bones training primitive, not an LMS.
Security teams building a cybersecurity workforce from scratch should choose SudoCyber for its hands-on lab environment that actually forces people to break things and fix them, not just click through modules. The platform covers CompTIA Security+, Network+, and CEH certifications while offering Capture the Flag competitions that make training stick better than passive content; it directly strengthens NIST CSF 2.0's Awareness and Training function. Skip this if your org needs enterprise-scale role-based learning paths or integration with your existing LMS; SudoCyber's strength is depth in technical skills for smaller teams, not breadth across hundreds of users with different compliance requirements.
