ExploitDB vs Synack Sara: 2026 Comparison
ExploitDB is a free penetration testing tool. Synack Sara is a commercial penetration testing tool by Synack. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers and red teams validating their attack surface need ExploitDB for its indexed proof-of-concept code tied directly to CVEs; you'll spend less time hunting GitHub for working exploits and more time running them. The archive covers over 20,000 public exploits with active maintenance, which matters when you're building a test plan against known vulnerabilities. Skip this if your org needs exploit intelligence abstracted into risk ratings or automated scanning; ExploitDB is a reference library, not a vulnerability scanner.
Security teams drowning in scan results will cut through the noise fastest with Synack Sara, which filters exploitable vulnerabilities from false positives through autonomous pentest logic rather than forcing analysts to triage manually. A 2-3 day time-to-value with AI testing in hours and human validation in days beats the standard 6-8 week pentest cycle, and the 75% cost reduction per engagement is real when you're running quarterly assessments across mid-market or enterprise infrastructure. Skip this if you need continuous runtime detection or prioritize speed over validation; Sara's strength is confidence in findings, not coverage velocity, and that human handoff means you're still waiting days for the final report.
