Evidian Enterprise Single Sign-On vs Mi-Token: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Evidian Enterprise Single Sign-On

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing mixed application estates,legacy mainframes alongside SaaS,should pick Evidian Enterprise Single Sign-On for its non-intrusive deployment that doesn't require application rewrites. The platform handles web, desktop, and legacy systems without modification, and its password lifecycle management with MFA support aligns directly with NIST PR.AA Identity Management controls. Skip this if your environment is purely cloud-native SaaS; you'll pay for legacy support you don't need when purpose-built cloud IAM platforms offer simpler administration.

Mi-Token

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing hybrid on-premises infrastructure with heavy Windows AD dependency will get the most from Mi-Token; its native Credential Provider support for Windows login and ADFS integration eliminates the friction of bolted-on MFA that breaks user workflows. The token independence supporting any OATH-compliant hardware token means you're not locked into a single vendor's devices, and NIST CSF 2.0 coverage of identity management and authentication reflects solid foundational design. Skip Mi-Token if your organization is cloud-first or needs cloud-native SSO; the on-premises architecture and legacy-heavy feature set make it a poor fit for teams migrating away from Active Directory.