AccessMatrix UAS vs Mi-Token: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

AccessMatrix UAS

Mid-market and enterprise teams standardizing on vendor-agnostic authentication will find AccessMatrix UAS valuable for avoiding lock-in while supporting biometrics, FIDO2, and hardware security modules in parallel. The platform handles 100 million plus user scale and integrates with token vendors from OneSpan to Thales without custom engineering, which matters when you're already managing heterogeneous hardware across regions. Skip this if your organization needs out-of-the-box connectors to your existing identity provider; AccessMatrix is an authentication server, not a replacement for your IAM platform.

Mi-Token

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing hybrid on-premises infrastructure with heavy Windows AD dependency will get the most from Mi-Token; its native Credential Provider support for Windows login and ADFS integration eliminates the friction of bolted-on MFA that breaks user workflows. The token independence supporting any OATH-compliant hardware token means you're not locked into a single vendor's devices, and NIST CSF 2.0 coverage of identity management and authentication reflects solid foundational design. Skip Mi-Token if your organization is cloud-first or needs cloud-native SSO; the on-premises architecture and legacy-heavy feature set make it a poor fit for teams migrating away from Active Directory.