Bright Sec Bright STAR vs Escape API Security Platform: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Bright Sec Bright STAR

Development teams shipping APIs at scale need Bright Sec Bright STAR for shadow API discovery and function-level vulnerability detection that catches what static tools miss before code hits production. The platform maps undocumented endpoints automatically and validates exploits in real time, cutting the noise that kills remediation workflows. Skip this if your infrastructure is mostly monolithic on-prem or you need manual penetration testing; Bright STAR assumes modern CI/CD and cloud-native API architectures.

Escape API Security Platform

Mid-market and enterprise teams building APIs and single-page applications should use Escape API Security Platform for business logic flaws that generic DAST tools ignore, particularly BOLA and IDOR vulnerabilities in GraphQL and microservice architectures. The platform's API discovery and automated remediation code generation cut the usual triage-to-fix cycle; CI/CD integration with low false positive rates means developers actually run it pre-commit instead of letting scan results pile up in tickets. Skip this if your attack surface is primarily traditional monolithic web apps or if you need runtime protection in addition to pre-deployment testing; Escape is strictly DAST-focused and won't catch post-deployment anomalies.