EnProbe Cybersecurity vs Paros: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros and cons, compared head to head.
EnProbe Cybersecurity is a commercial dynamic application security testing tool by Entersoft Security. Paros is a free dynamic application security testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best dynamic application security testing fit for your security stack. Independent and vendor-neutral: we never sell rankings.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Startups and SMBs with lightweight development teams should pick EnProbe Cybersecurity for fast, language-agnostic web app scanning without the overhead of on-premise infrastructure or per-page licensing traps. The tool scans 100+ attack vectors including OWASP Top 10 and handles AJAX/JavaScript sites that simpler scanners miss, covering both ID.RA risk assessment and PR.PS platform security in the NIST CSF. Skip this if you need integrated SAST/DAST or deep API security; EnProbe is web application vulnerability assessment only, not a broader AppSec platform.
Development teams and pentesters evaluating web application security on a zero budget should pilot Paros; its Java-based proxy architecture handles manual and semi-automated vulnerability discovery without licensing friction, making it ideal for teams building testing workflows before committing to commercial DAST. The tool has been actively maintained for nearly two decades and integrates cleanly with CI/CD pipelines for teams willing to script around its GUI. Skip Paros if you need automated scanning at scale, machine-learning-driven payload generation, or support for modern API authentication schemes; it's a manual-heavy framework that demands operator expertise to extract full value.
