What is the difference between Embed Agentic Security Platform vs Ripple?

**Embed Agentic Security Platform**: Agentic AI platform that automates security alert triage and investigation. built by Embed Security. Core capabilities include Automated alert triage and investigation via AI agents, iSteps (Investigation Steps) library for repeatable analyst-derived actions, Security-focused AI reasoning engine.. **Ripple**: A panic button application that triggers coordinated emergency responses across multiple connected security applications and systems.. Both serve the Security Orchestration Automation and Response market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Who makes Embed Agentic Security Platform vs Ripple?

**Embed Agentic Security Platform** is developed by Embed Security. **Ripple** is open-source with 279 GitHub stars. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Is Embed Agentic Security Platform a good alternative to Ripple?

Embed Agentic Security Platform and Ripple serve similar Security Orchestration Automation and Response use cases: both are Security Orchestration Automation and Response tools, both cover Security Orchestration, Alerting. Key differences: Embed Agentic Security Platform is Commercial while Ripple is Free, Ripple is open-source. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.

Embed Agentic Security Platform vs Ripple: Features, Integrations, Reviews (2026) | CybersecTools

Embed Agentic Security Platform vs Ripple: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.

Embed Agentic Security Platform is a commercial security orchestration automation and response tool by Embed Security. Ripple is a free security orchestration automation and response tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best security orchestration automation and response fit for your security stack.

CST Verdict

Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:

Ripple

Security teams managing fragmented tool stacks without a coordinated incident response workflow should evaluate Ripple for its ability to trigger synchronized actions across disconnected systems in seconds. The free pricing model with 279 GitHub stars suggests active community validation of the core panic-button use case. Skip this if your stack already includes a mature SOAR platform with native orchestration; Ripple fills the gap for teams that need speed over feature depth, but won't replace workflow automation at scale.

Data verified May 2026