EDR Healthcheck vs FortifyData Security Ratings: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Short answer

Security teams that doubt their EDR is actually catching attacks should run EDR Healthcheck before your next board meeting; it runs autonomous penetration tests that expose detection gaps your vendor's marketing claims won't reveal. The tool maps directly to NIST DE.CM and DE.AE, meaning you get continuous visibility into which attack techniques slip past your controls and why. Skip this if you're looking for a platform that remediates findings automatically; Healthcheck tells you what's broken, not how to fix it. Mid-market and enterprise teams managing sprawling vendor ecosystems will get the most from FortifyData Security Ratings because its weekly asset discovery updates catch new third-party relationships before risk assessment cycles even start. The platform maps to NIST GV.SC and ID.AM by design, automatically surfacing in-scope vendors and their attack surface without manual questionnaire overhead. Skip this if your primary need is incident response orchestration or if you're already embedded in a point solution that does vendor risk adequately; FortifyData's strength is breadth of third-party visibility, not depth in any single risk domain.