Ebowla vs pybof: 2026 Comparison
Ebowla is a free offensive security tool. pybof is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers and red teamers who need fast, modular payload generation across Windows and Linux targets should use Ebowla for its native support of Reflective DLL injection without external dependencies. The tool's 761 GitHub stars and active maintenance signal real adoption in offensive workflows where payload obfuscation and language flexibility matter more than UI polish. Skip this if your team needs a full-featured C2 framework or graphical payload builder; Ebowla is command-line first and assumes you know what you're injecting.
Red teamers and penetration testers who need to execute custom BOFs without touching disk will find PyBOF essential for post-exploitation work; it's the only Python-native option for in-memory Beacon Object File execution, letting you skip Cobalt Strike's GUI entirely and automate payloads programmatically. The 80 GitHub stars and active maintenance signal real adoption among operators, not just theoretical interest. Skip this if you're looking for evasion magic; PyBOF assumes you've already got execution and focuses narrowly on loading and running BOFs, which means your success depends entirely on the quality of the BOF itself and your network position.
