Eagle vs is-website-vulnerable: 2026 Comparison
Eagle is a free security scanning tool. is-website-vulnerable is a free security scanning tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best security scanning fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Developers and small security teams running manual penetration tests will find Eagle valuable for its multithreaded scanning speed, which processes web applications significantly faster than single-threaded alternatives without requiring licensing overhead. The free, open-source model with 126 GitHub stars indicates active maintenance and community validation for basic vulnerability detection workflows. Skip Eagle if you need authenticated scanning, API coverage, or integration with existing SAST/DAST pipelines; it's a lightweight scanner for low-complexity assessments, not a replacement for commercial web application firewalls.
DevSecOps teams managing frontend supply chain risk should use is-website-vulnerable because it catches known JavaScript library vulnerabilities that most web application scanners deprioritize, and it's free, which removes the friction of piloting before committing budget. The 2,021 GitHub stars reflect actual adoption by teams building CI/CD scanning into their pipelines rather than relying on manual assessments. Skip this if you need coverage beyond frontend dependencies or want detection across your entire application stack; is-website-vulnerable is deliberately narrow, scanning only what Snyk's database knows about, not unknown or server-side vulnerabilities.
