Duo Multi-Factor Authentication vs Microsoft Entra ID: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Duo Multi-Factor Authentication

Teams prioritizing frictionless adoption across mixed device ecosystems should start with Duo Multi-Factor Authentication; its push-based approval model converts skeptical end users faster than SMS or TOTP alone, which matters when you're racing against internal resistance. The platform covers NIST CSF 2.0's PR.AA authentication requirement and ships with straightforward integrations for common SaaS and on-prem applications, reducing deployment friction in mid-market environments. Skip this if you need passwordless authentication as your primary mechanism or require deep integration with legacy mainframe systems where Duo's cloud-native design creates friction.

Microsoft Entra ID

Enterprise and mid-market teams already committed to Microsoft 365 should choose Microsoft Entra ID because it eliminates the identity tax of managing a separate platform, with conditional access policies that actually enforce what your Microsoft-native apps require. NIST CSF 2.0 coverage on PR.AA (Identity Management, Authentication, and Access Control) is solid, and the integration with Security Copilot means threat investigation workflows stay within your existing Microsoft ecosystem rather than forcing context-switching. Skip this if you need deep API governance or fine-grained entitlements for non-Microsoft SaaS applications; Entra ID treats those as secondary use cases, and you'll end up stitching in third-party tools anyway.