drydock vs RapidFort Runtime Protection: 2026 Comparison
drydock is a free container security tool. RapidFort Runtime Protection is a commercial container security tool by RapidFort. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best container security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
DevOps teams running Docker in CI/CD pipelines need Drydock because it audits container images against CIS benchmarks before they hit production, catching misconfigurations that scanners miss. The tool ships with customizable profiles and JSON output, so you can integrate it directly into your build process without manual remediation work. Skip this if your organization requires a graphical dashboard or runtime monitoring; Drydock is audit-focused and doesn't track container behavior after deployment.
Enterprise security teams managing large Kubernetes clusters will see the fastest ROI from RapidFort Runtime Protection because it cuts container attack surface by up to 90 percent while adding less than 1 percent compute overhead, eliminating the usual performance tradeoff that kills adoption. The platform's execution path analysis directly addresses NIST ID.RA by surfacing only reachable vulnerabilities instead of flooding teams with noise from unreachable flaws. Skip this if you need multi-cloud coverage or runtime protection outside Kubernetes; RapidFort is built specifically for hardening containerized workloads, not general infrastructure.
