Donut vs NomadBishop: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Donut is a free offensive security tool. NomadBishop is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Red teamers and penetration testers who need to deliver .NET and PE payloads that evade memory-scanning EDR will find Donut essential; it generates position-independent shellcode that executes directly from memory without touching disk, eliminating the most common detection vector. With 4,492 GitHub stars and active community contributions, the tool has been battle-tested across real engagements and stays current with Windows API changes. Skip this if you're looking for post-exploitation frameworks with built-in C2 capability or if your scope is limited to external reconnaissance; Donut is narrowly focused on the injection problem and assumes you already have payload delivery sorted.
Red teamers and penetration testers running Windows assessments will want NomadBishop for its lightweight process injection without EDR hooks; the SysWhispers-generated syscall macros bypass userland API monitoring that catches most commodity tools. The free price and x64/x86 dual support mean minimal friction in engagements where you need a reliable injection primitive fast. Skip this if you need post-exploitation persistence or lateral movement beyond code execution; NomadBishop does injection cleanly but leaves you to chain it into larger attack workflows yourself.
