Dirtyc0w Docker POC vs MagSpoof: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Dirtyc0w Docker POC is a free offensive security tool. MagSpoof is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Security researchers and red team operators validating Docker container hardening need Dirtyc0w Docker POC because it isolates the exact privilege escalation path that AppArmor profiles must block, turning a 2016 kernel vulnerability into a concrete test case. The 14 GitHub stars underscore it's a niche tool with a tight community rather than broad adoption, but that's the point: it cuts through abstraction and forces you to verify your mitigation actually works. Skip this if you're looking for a general-purpose container penetration testing framework; this is deliberately narrow, targeting one exploit on one workload to answer one question.
Penetration testers and hardware security researchers validating payment terminal defenses need MagSpoof because it's one of the few free tools that actually demonstrates magnetic stripe cloning attacks without requiring expensive lab equipment or proprietary hardware. The 4,098 GitHub stars and active security research community mean you're working with a tool battle-tested by real red teamers, not theoretical code. Skip this if your scope is modern contactless or EMV chip validation; MagSpoof's strength is proving legacy magnetic stripe vulnerabilities that most organizations have already mitigated.
