Dendrobate vs Donut: 2026 Comparison
Dendrobate is a free offensive security tool. Donut is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers and red team operators building custom .NET payloads will find Dendrobate's managed code hooking template valuable for avoiding boilerplate; the 135 GitHub stars and zero licensing friction mean you can fork it, modify it, and deploy it in engagements without vendor friction. The real strength here is that it abstracts away the low-level assembly manipulation that usually consumes days of development, leaving you to focus on hook logic instead of IL rewriting. This is not a tool for blue teams or anyone needing operational visibility into API calls; it's purpose-built for offense, not detection or monitoring.
Red teamers and penetration testers who need to deliver .NET and PE payloads that evade memory-scanning EDR will find Donut essential; it generates position-independent shellcode that executes directly from memory without touching disk, eliminating the most common detection vector. With 4,492 GitHub stars and active community contributions, the tool has been battle-tested across real engagements and stays current with Windows API changes. Skip this if you're looking for post-exploitation frameworks with built-in C2 capability or if your scope is limited to external reconnaissance; Donut is narrowly focused on the injection problem and assumes you already have payload delivery sorted.
